§

Southern Power Co.

353 N.L.R.B. 1085 (N.L.R.B. 2009)
Southern Power Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Strand Theatre v. N.L.R.B

    493 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that presenting a union with a ` fait accompli . . . unilaterally inform[ing] the [u]nion that position had already been eliminated" violated a union's right to bargaining provided by the Act

  3. Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

  4. California Pacific Medical v. N.L.R.B

    87 F.3d 304 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 26 times

    No. 93-71039, 94-70009 Argued and Submitted August 15, 1995, San Francisco, California Filed June 19, 1996 Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson, Falk Rabkin, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-respondent. Richard A. Cohen, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the respondent-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CA-24067. Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER, CECIL F. POOLE, and DIARMUID

  5. Harter Tomato Products Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 22 times

    No. 96-1326 Argued December 11, 1997 Decided January 23, 1998 Warren Davison argued the cause for petitioner/cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Mary E. Bruno. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent/cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Fred Cornnell, Supervisory Attorney. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of

  6. Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    101 F.3d 111 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Collecting standards

  7. Int'l U. of Elec., Radio Mach. v. N.L.R.B

    604 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 38 times
    Affirming Board's finding subset of historic bargaining unit has relevant bargaining history

  8. Lincoln Park Zoological Society v. Natioanal Labor Relations Board

    116 F.3d 216 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 15 times
    Applying the successorship principle in the context of a public to private transition

  9. ZIM'S FOODLINER, INC. v. N.L.R.B

    495 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that the owner of a single store purchased from the Kroger chain was a successor employer

  10. Saks Co. v. N.L.R.B

    634 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "diminution in unit size is insufficient to rebut the presumption of continued majority status"