§

Southern Nuclear Operating Co.

348 N.L.R.B. 1344 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Southern Nuclear Operating Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen

    514 U.S. 73 (1995)   Cited 694 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a clause reserving the company's right "at any time to amend the plan" meets the requirements of 29 U.S.C. § 1102(b)

  2. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  3. Neo Gen Screening, Inc. v. New England Newborn Screening Program

    528 U.S. 1061 (1999)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-617. December 13, 1999. C.A. 1st. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 187 F. 3d 24.

  4. Rossetto v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc.

    128 F.3d 538 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that retirees' claims “for benefits ... belong to the retirees individually, and the retirees may deal directly with [the employer] in pursuing such claims”

  5. Mississippi Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    284 F.3d 605 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 15 times
    Describing the competing standards

  6. Natonal Labor Relations Board v. Columbus Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union No. 252

    543 F.2d 1161 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that interest arbitration clauses "are not enforceable to perpetuate inclusion of [interest] arbitration clauses continuously in contract after contract"