§

Southern Nevada Home Builders Association, Inc.

274 N.L.R.B. 350 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Southern Nevada Home Builders Association, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of

  5. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. Co.

    696 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the union "has the initial burden of showing relevancy" where it alleges that the employer is using "double breasted operations" to evade contractual obligations with the union, i.e., the employer is allegedly operating two corporations, one hiring strictly union employees, and the other, nonunion employees, to compete for both union and nonunion work

  7. Press Democrat Pub. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 1320 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 79-7086 to 79-7089 and 79-7158 to 79-7161. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1980. Decided October 8, 1980. James E. Boddy, Jr., Irwin Leff, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for petitioners; James C. Paras, Irwin Leff, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. W. Christian Schumann, NLRB, Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., on brief. Petitions for Review and Cross-Applications for Enforcement of Orders of National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and POOLE, Circuit

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Temple-Eastex, Inc.

    579 F.2d 932 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 9 times

    No. 77-2272. September 8, 1978. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate, Gen. Counsel, Janet C. McCaa, Supervisor, Susan T. Papadopoulos, Jesse I. Etelson, Attys., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. John B. Abercrombie, Coyt Randal Johnston, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG and RUBIN, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order against Temple-Eastex, Incorporated

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lumber and Mill Employers Ass'n

    736 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1984)

    No. 83-7117. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1984. Decided June 27, 1984. Howard Perlstein, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.K. Abraham, Robert M. Cassel, Berman, Cassel Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge. Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge:

  10. Torrington Co. v. N.L.R.B

    545 F.2d 840 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 230, 231, Dockets 76-4135, 76-4157. Argued December 1, 1976. Decided December 14, 1976. Jay S. Siegel, Hartford, Conn. (Siegel, O'Connor Kainen, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for petitioner. James M. Hirschhorn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson and Thomas A. Woodley, Attys., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for