§

Southern California Edison Co.

295 N.L.R.B. 203 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Southern California Edison Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  5. Local Union 1395, Intern. Broth. v. N.L.R.B

    797 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 50 times
    Adopting this section of the Restatement

  6. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Central Power Light Company

    425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Central Pwr. Light Co., 425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970), the original charge alleged a discriminatory discharge of an employee and stated the company had violated section 7 rights "by other acts and conduct."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec Wkrs., Local 11

    772 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    No. 84-7439. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1985. Decided September 24, 1985. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard, Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner N.L.R.B. Robert Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-intervenors Loveall, Sokol and Mott. Elizabeth R. Lishner, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN

  9. N.L.R.B. v. SCAM INSTRUMENT CORPORATION

    394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times

    No. 16599. May 15, 1968. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Burton L. Raimi, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, for petitioner. George L. Plumb, Chicago, Ill., Peer Pedersen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent; Pedersen Houpt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before KNOCH, Senior Circuit Judge, and CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case

  10. Exber, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 3 times

    No. 21362. March 5, 1968. Fredrick N. Richman (argued), Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Harvey Letter (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Wayne S. Bishop, Joseph C. Thackery, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. JAMESON, District Judge: This