369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
In Ladies' Garment Workers, the Second Circuit stated that "no genuine bargaining... can be conducted where the decision has already been made and implemented."
Ruling that "[h]ealth care plans are mandatory subjects of bargaining" under the NLRA, and holding that a company's unilateral, material changes to health care benefits violates the Act
Determining that the Board had not sufficiently explained itself where it was “difficult to ascertain ... why the Board apparently departed from its precedents”