§

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

21-CA-150088 (N.L.R.B. May. 26, 2016)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

7 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  5. Unite Here v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    546 F.3d 239 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 5 times
    Affirming the Board's decision in N. Am. Pipe Corp., 347 N.L.R.B. 836

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Electric Steam Radiator Corp.

    321 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 28 times
    Containing similar language

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Central Illinois Public Serv. Co.

    324 F.2d 916 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 25 times
    Upholding award of prejudgment interest under § 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act