Southeastern Michigan Gas Co.
4 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 709 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company
405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 40 timesNoting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits
N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.
434 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 30 timesNo. 28576. November 2, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, La., David E. Rosenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Spring, Md., for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, William F. Banta, Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges
J.J. Newberry Co. v. N.L.R.B
442 F.2d 897 (2d Cir. 1971) Cited 17 timesIn Newberry, the status quo with regard to wage increases was unclear not so much because wage review was not predictable — on the contrary, an employee was reviewed every six months, "although the timing might vary by several months," 442 F.2d at 898 — but because wage increases were neither "automatic nor uniform.