§

South Nassau Communities Hospital

274 N.L.R.B. 1181 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
South Nassau Communities Hospital

7 Cited authorities

  1. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 220 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms

  4. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Los Angeles New Hospital

    640 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    No. 80-7073. Argued and Submitted November 5, 1980. Decided March 6, 1981. Susan L. Dolin, Richard M. Fischl, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Catherine Hagen, O'Melveny Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and TANG, Circuit Judges, and HANSON, Senior District Judge. The Honorable William C. Hanson, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern and Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation

  6. N.L.R.B. v. North Shore University Hosp

    724 F.2d 269 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 5 times
    In North Shore, we identified the reasons behind the concern about an employee organization in which supervisors are active participants. "First, supervisors who participate actively in a professional organization which represents (or is seeking to represent) rank and file employees who serve under them, are by the very nature of their relationship to their employer and to the professional organization subject to conflicting pressures."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Saint Vincent's Hosp

    729 F.2d 730 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    No. 83-7203. April 9, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Bernstein and Ellen A. Farrell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Hopkins, Lang, Simpson, Robinson Sommerville, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. Honorable Edward S. Smith, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. GODBOLD, Chief Judge: