§

South Hills Health System

240 N.L.R.B. 69 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
South Hills Health System

18 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,296 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Siegel Co. v. N. L. R. B

    398 U.S. 959 (1970)   Cited 134 times

    No. 1525. June 15, 1970. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 417 F. 2d 1206.

  5. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.

    121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 85 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.

  7. J.C. Penney Co. v. N.L.R.B

    384 F.2d 479 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times

    No. 8874. August 29, 1967. William C. McClearn, Denver, Colo. (Robert L. Morris, Morris B. Hecox, Denver, Colo., Eugene F. Rowan and Martin Zeiger, New York City, with him on brief), for petitioner. Peter M. Giesey, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This matter arises from two separate unfair

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Prince Macaroni Manufacturing Co.

    329 F.2d 803 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 6171. March 31, 1964. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Stuart Broad, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. William F. Joy, Boston, Mass., with whom John J. Desmond, III, and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill

    308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times

    No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Saunders Leasing System, Inc.

    497 F.2d 453 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    No. 73-1605. Submitted February 12, 1974. Decided May 14, 1974. Corinna Metcalf, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edward R. Young, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before MEHAFFY, Chief Judge, and GIBSON and WEBSTER, Circuit Judges. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order issued June 25, 1973, and reported at 204 NLRB No. 68, which directed the Respondent, Saunders Leasing

  11. Section 15 - Repealed

    29 U.S.C. § 15   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses

    29 U.S.C. § 15 Pub. L. 89-554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644 Section, act June 5, 1920, ch. 248, §4, 41 Stat. 987, authorized employment by Woman's Bureau of Department of Labor of such employees at such rates of compensation as Congress may provide by appropriation.