§

South East Coal Co.

242 N.L.R.B. 547 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
South East Coal Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Basic Wire Products, Inc.

    516 F.2d 261 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 26 times
    Stating that the NLRB "properly refused to invalidate the election or to hold a hearing on the allegations" of election abuses where "[t]he only evidence proffered by [employer] was an affidavit of its Vice President to the effect that `union people' told several employees `that it would pay to support the Union'"

  3. International Un., United A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times
    Rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as "as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves" and concluding statements were used only to "place . . . other acts in context"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. McCready and Sons, Inc.

    482 F.2d 872 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1320. Argued October 16, 1972. Decided June 29, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., Robert A. Giannasi, N.L.R.B., for petitioner-appellant; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Stephen J. Solomon, Allen H. Feldman, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief. Craig A. Miller, Kalamazoo, Mich., for respondents-appellees; Gemrich, Moser, Dombrowski, Bowser Garvey by Craig A. Miller, Kalamazoo, Mich., on brief for

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Shawnee Industries, Inc.

    333 F.2d 221 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 23 times
    Holding promulgation of an overly broad rule without enforcement not illegal under the special circumstances presented

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Textile Mach. Works

    214 F.2d 929 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Textile Machine Works, Inc., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 this court held that a complaint against Textile, alleging violations by it of Section 8(a)(1), (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, was barred by the time limitation imposed by Section 10(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), where workers had requested reinstatement rather than employment as new employees.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Pennwoven, Inc.

    194 F.2d 521 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 26 times
    Rejecting the Board's contention that an employer's discriminatory failure to reinstate an employee constituted a continuing violation, since under that reasoning the employee's case would never be closed until it was finally litigated

  8. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    374 F.2d 734 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 9 times

    No. 15757. February 27, 1967. Rehearing Denied April 6, 1967. John F. McClure, Chicago, Ill., Joseph Alton Jenkins, Dallas, Tex., D.C. Duck, Douglas J. Hill, Cadick, Burns, Duck Neighbours, Indianapolis, Ind., Joseph Alton Jenkins Associates, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Charles N. Steele, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CASTLE

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Albritton Engineering Corporation

    340 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 10 times

    No. 21064. January 11, 1965. Rehearing Denied February 23, 1965. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. L.G. Clinton, Jr., H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex. (Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel), for Albritton Engineering Corp. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lummus Co.

    210 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times

    No. 14520. February 12, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Elmer Davis, Chief Law Officer, N.L.R.B., Fort Worth, Tex., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dean E. Denlinger, Atty., N.L.R.B., Dayton, Ohio, for petitioner. Quentin Keith, Cecil, Keith Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit