6 Cited authorities
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 timesHolding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company
360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 51 timesPermitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award
N.L.R.B. v. Seligman and Associates, Inc.
808 F.2d 1155 (6th Cir. 1986) Cited 6 timesNo. 85-5404. Argued April 28, 1986. Decided December 30, 1986. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William R. Stewart, Stephen Smith (argued), Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, NLRB, Patrick V. McNamara, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Richard Bisio (argued), Hyman, Gurwin, Nachman, Friedman Winkelman, Southfield, Mich., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ENGEL, KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges. ENGEL, Circuit
N.L.R.B. v. Arduini Manufacturing Corp.
394 F.2d 420 (1st Cir. 1968) Cited 24 timesHolding that plaintiffs delay of several days in accepting a job offer demonstrated a lack of reasonable diligence in mitigating damages and tolled plaintiffs right to backpay
N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.
366 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 23 timesNo. 19448. September 30, 1966. Melvin J. Welles, Paul Elkind, Robert B. Schwartz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge. William Harold Cox, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: We hope that this opinion proves
National Labor Rel. Board v. Cashman Auto Co.
223 F.2d 832 (1st Cir. 1955) Cited 20 timesIn NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.