§
SOLUTIA, INC.

14 Cited authorities

  1. St. George Warehouse, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable

  2. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 51 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction

  3. Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 31 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

  4. Bath Marine v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a motion for reconsideration was not required to exhaust where the Board had "adequate notice" of the party's position

  5. Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    907 F.2d 963 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 30 times
    In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.

  6. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 150-A v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    1 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 26 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court may not certify a class without ruling that each Rule 23 requirement is met, even if a requirement overlaps with a merits issue

  7. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    974 F.2d 933 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 23 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that where the contract defines the parties' rights as to mandatory subjects of bargaining, the contract will control

  8. JHP & Associates, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    360 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2004)   Cited 10 times

    No. 03-2303. Submitted: November 17, 2003. Filed: March 16, 2004. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence P. Kaplan, argued, St. Louis, MO (Joshua M. Avigad, St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for appellant. Jeffrey L. Horowitz, argued, of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. (Charles Donnelly of the NLRB, Washington, D.C. appeared on the brief), for appellee. James I. Singer, argued, St. Louis, MO, intervenor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No

  9. Pan American Grain Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    558 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 4 times

    No. 08-1351. Heard December 3, 2008. Decided February 24, 2009. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Boudin, Chief Circuit Judge. Rafael J. Lopez with whom Ruperto J. Robles was on brief for petitioner. Greg P. Lauro with whom Meredith L. Jason, Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and National Labor Relations Board were on brief for Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. Before

  10. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    765 F.2d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer is prohibited "from altering contractual terms concerning mandatory subjects of bargaining during the life of a collective bargaining agreement without the consent of the union"