§

SNE Enterprises, Inc.

348 N.L.R.B. 1041 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
SNE Enterprises, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Service American Corp.

    841 F.2d 191 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 19 times
    Noting the Seventh Circuit's apparent inconsistency in determining agency in the union election context by comparing the approach taken in NLRB v. Katz, 701 F.2d 703 (7th Cir. 1983) (rules of agency are liberally construed in the union election context) with Tuf-Flex Glass v. NLRB, 715 F.2d 291, 296 (7th Cir. 1983) (test for agency in union election context is stringent)

  2. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WFMT

    997 F.2d 269 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-3731. Argued September 22, 1992. Decided June 21, 1993. Jill A. Griffin (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Chicago, IL, Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, Nancy B. Hunt, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Gilbert A. Cornfield, Cornfield Feldman, William L. Becker, Michael Klupchak (argued), Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, IL, for respondent. Petition

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Hawaiian Flour Mill, Inc.

    792 F.2d 1459 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 5 times
    Reasoning that a supervisor's "[t]alking to employees about the union, expressing personal views about the union, and answering questions about the union are permissible expressions of opinion when made in noncoercive and nonthreatening circumstances"