Snap-On Tools, Inc

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Bockes v. Fields

    510 U.S. 1092 (1994)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 93-818. January 24, 1994, October TERM, 1993. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 F. 2d 788.

  4. Unbelievable v. Nat. Labor Relations Bd.

    118 F.3d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Applying the American Rule to National Labor Relations Board proceedings
  5. Millard Processing Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    2 F.3d 258 (8th Cir. 1993)   Cited 18 times
    Recognizing that election surveillance may be problematic, but enforcing Board bargaining order where cable television employee, who was not a union agent, videotaped employees during election campaign and union official explained that cameraman was not affiliated with the union to every employee who asked
  6. NATIONAL LAB. REL. BD. v. DYNATRON/BONDO

    176 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 10 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Acknowledging evidence tending to show the Board's comparators were not similarly situated to an employee who received harsher treatment, but nonetheless concluding substantial evidence supported the Board's finding
  7. National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    156 F.3d 1268 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding the Board's finding that a company committed an unfair labor practice by videotaping union rallies without sufficient justification
  8. Hickory Springs Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    645 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 5 times
    Denying enforcement of the Board's order in Hickory Springs