§

Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises

32-CA-024480 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 5, 2010)
Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises

8 Cited authorities

  1. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 329 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  4. Pleasantview Nursing Home, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    351 F.3d 747 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that oral modification of a collective bargaining agreement was ineffective in the presence of "an express zipper clause prohibiting modification except by written agreement"

  5. Richmond Recording Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    836 F.2d 289 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 30 times
    Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"

  6. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems v. N.L.R.B

    236 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that when, among other factors, a new negotiator was substituted, "the lack of a significant bargaining history would dictate giving the parties a fuller opportunity to effect an agreement than occurred here"

  7. Inland Tugs v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    918 F.2d 1299 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 89-3395, 89-3688. Argued May 16, 1990. Decided November 26, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 7, 1991. Carol L. VanHal, Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., David W. Miller, Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, Ind., Vance D. Miller, Lashly, Baer Hamel, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Howard E. Perlstein, Joseph H. Bornong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., William T. Little, N.L.R.B., Indianapolis

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Massachusetts Nurses Ass'n

    557 F.2d 894 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 12 times

    No. 76-1451. June 24, 1977. Alan Banov, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. James T. Grady, Boston, Mass., with whom Grady McDonald, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge, and MARKEY, Chief Judge. Of the Court