Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
  2. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,893 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
  3. Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    363 U.S. 564 (1960)   Cited 2,229 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
  4. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  5. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
  6. Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers

    414 U.S. 368 (1974)   Cited 369 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that contractual agreement to submit disagreements to binding arbitration included disputes over safety and thus gave rise to implied obligation not to strike over such disputes
  7. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 50 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction
  8. Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Div. v. N.L.R.B

    722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 17 times
    In Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Division v. NLRB, 722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983), the court rejected an argument that an "extracontractual residual rights" theory allowed imposition of attendance rules.
  9. Resorts Intern. Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B

    996 F.2d 1553 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. 92-3557 and 92-3625. Argued May 4, 1993. Decided July 1, 1993. Howard R. Flaxman, (argued), Blank, Rome, Comisky McCauley, Philadelphia, PA, for Resorts Intern. Hotel Casino. Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Atty. Counsel, David Seid, Atty., John D. Burgoyne (argued), Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, National Relations Bd., Washington DC, for NLRB

  10. Doerfer Engineering v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    79 F.3d 101 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 95-1376, 95-1581. Submitted September 13, 1995. Decided March 22, 1996. On Petition for Review from the National Labor Relations Board. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Thomas Hanna of St. Louis, Missouri. Appearing on the brief was Ralph E. Kennedy. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Julie Broido of Washington, D.C. Appearing on the brief was Linda Dreeben. Before MCMILLIAN, HEANEY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Doerfer