§

Smitty's Supermarkets

310 N.L.R.B. 1377 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Smitty's Supermarkets

13 Cited authorities

  1. Okla. Press Pub. Co. v. Walling

    327 U.S. 186 (1946)   Cited 813 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although agency must defend purpose behind investigation, it is not required to prove cause of action at subpoena enforcement stage

  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  3. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins

    317 U.S. 501 (1943)   Cited 315 times
    Holding it is the duty of the District Court to order production of evidence unless it is "plainly incompetent or irrelevant to any lawful purpose of the Secretary in the discharge of his duties under the Act."

  4. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  5. Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Brimson

    154 U.S. 447 (1894)   Cited 264 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compelling a witness to testify before an agency and to produce documents "cannot be directly enforced except by judicial process"

  6. Atlantic Richfield Co v. U.S. Dept. of Energy

    769 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that claim for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding an administrative order imposing discovery sanctions was ripe for review

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Medication Systems, Ltd.

    640 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reasoning that a court will enforce an agency subpoena if, inter alia, it "is not needlessly broad"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. G.H.R. Energy Corp.

    707 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that reversal of a district court's order enforcing an NLRB subpoena is appropriate "only in the most extraordinary of circumstances"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Selwyn Shoe Manufacturing Corp.

    428 F.2d 217 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 23 times
    In NLRB v. Selwyn Shoe Manufacturing Corp., 428 F.2d 217 (8th Cir. 1970), the court's holding was that there was not substantial evidence to support the Board's findings of §§ 8(a)(3) and (1) violations.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. American Art Industries, Inc.

    415 F.2d 1223 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Upholding the Bannon Mills principle and recognizing that "to maintain the integrity of the hearing process" the ALJ properly refused to admit secondary evidence proffered by the employer which it refused to produce in the face of a valid subpoena duces tecum