Smitty'S Super Market, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under ยง 7 or prohibited by ยง 8 of the NLRA
  2. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
  3. Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner

    407 U.S. 551 (1972)   Cited 466 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private shopping center did not violate the First Amendment by prohibiting the distribution of handbills on its property
  4. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,499 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
  5. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  6. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates ยง 8 of the NLRA
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  8. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
  9. Giant Food Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    633 F.2d 18 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 13 times
    Observing that generally it will be easier to communicate with a specific number of discrete employees than with potential customers of a large retail store
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Jack La Lanne Management Corp.

    539 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v. Jack La Lanne Management Corp., 539 F.2d 292, 293 (2d Cir. 1976), we enforced an order requiring the posting of notices at all of the company's ten New York City health spas after flagrant unfair labor practices were found at one of the facilities.