§

Smith's Transfer Corp.

167 N.L.R.B. 632 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Smith's Transfer Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  3. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 56 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ritchie Manufacturing Company

    354 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times

    No. 17978. December 14, 1965. As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1966. Gary Green, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, on the brief, for petitioner. Rex J. Ryden, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown; Iowa, H.G. Cartwright, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co.

    130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942)   Cited 69 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942), Judge Learned Hand stated his view of the type of activity protected by section 7.

  6. Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    No. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom

  7. N.L.R.B. v. L.G. Everist, Inc.

    334 F.2d 312 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 17486. July 23, 1964. Janet A. Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the petitioner and Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison and Paul Resnik, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief. Curtis L. Roy, of Dorsey, Owen, Marquart, Windhorst West, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for the respondent and filed brief with Curtis D. Forslund, Minneapolis, Minn., and John

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Gibbs Corporation

    297 F.2d 649 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 5 times
    Beating of union organizers

  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Thread Co.

    204 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 2 times

    No. 13883. May 6, 1953. Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and D.P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. When this petition for enforcement was originally before us there was no occasion to discuss the merits of the Board's decision for, following the decision in N.L.R.B. v. Dant, 9 Cir., 195