§

SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Xechem, Inc.

No. 91102846 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 18, 1998)
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Xechem, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.

    837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"

  2. King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen

    496 F.2d 1400 (C.C.P.A. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Patent Appeal No. 9245. June 6, 1974. J. Timothy Hobbs, Washington, D.C. (Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Washington, D.C.), attorney of record, for appellant. William B. Mason, Arlington, Va. (Mason, Mason Albright, Arlington, Va.), attorney of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. MARKEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 178 USPQ 121 (1973)

  3. Glenwood Laboratories v. Am. Home Prod

    455 F.2d 1384 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 4 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8612. March 9, 1972. Rehearing Denied April 20, 1972. Eugene C. Knoblock, South Bend, Ind., attorney of record, for appellant. Mortimer Altin, Julius A. Bell, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges, and RAO, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation. LANE, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 161 USPQ 826 (1969)