§

Smith Transit, Inc.

176 N.L.R.B. 1074 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Smith Transit, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  4. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company

    405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 40 times
    Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

  6. Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    No. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom

  7. Wonder State Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 737 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15390. April 2, 1964. V. Lee McMahon, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. McMahon Zempel, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel. Jules H. Gordon, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court upon the petition

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Superex Drugs, Inc.

    341 F.2d 747 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 15748. January 21, 1965. Morton Namrow, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, Wilbur L. Collins, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief; George A. Leonard, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for respondents. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, CECIL, Circuit Judge, and SMITH, District Judge

  9. Truck Drivers Helpers, 728 v. N.L.R.B

    364 F.2d 682 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 19703, 19720. Argued March 16, 1966. Decided June 28, 1966. Mr. David R. Richards, Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19,703. Mrs. Janet Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent in No. 19

  10. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"