4 Cited authorities
In re Boston Beer Co. Ltd. Partnership
198 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 1999) Cited 14 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the claim "The Best Beer in America" amounted to mere puffery
In re Bush Bros. Co.
884 F.2d 569 (Fed. Cir. 1989) Cited 16 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 89-1071. September 1, 1989. Edward G. Fenwick, Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Washington, D.C., submitted for appellant. With him on the brief was Brian D. Anderson. Albin F. Drost, Associate Sol., Office of the Sol., of Arlington, Va., submitted for appellee. With him on the brief was Fred E. McKelvey, Sol. Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial Appeal Board. Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and BISSELL, Circuit Judge. PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge
Application of Helena Rubinstein, Inc.
410 F.2d 438 (C.C.P.A. 1969) Cited 10 timesPatent Appeal Nos. 8144, 8145. May 15, 1969. Laforest S. Saulsbury, New York City, attorney of record, for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Jack E. Armore, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, McGUIRE, Judge, sitting by designation, and RICH, ALMOND and BALDWIN, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. We are confronted here with two separate appeals from a single decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirming the examiner's refusal to
Section 1091 - Supplemental register
15 U.S.C. § 1091 Cited 80 timesStating that marks registered on the Supplemental Register "must be capable of distinguishing the applicant's goods or services"