§

Simpson Electric Co.

249 N.L.R.B. 148 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Simpson Electric Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Styletek, Div. of Pandel-Bradford

    520 F.2d 275 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times

    No. 75-1017. Argued June 3, 1975. Decided August 6, 1975. Margery E. Lieber, Atty., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. George H. Foley, Boston, Mass., with whom Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Rich's of Plymouth, Inc.

    578 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that employer did not violate NLRA by following established policy of refusing to rehire union employees who quit

  4. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    585 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Reopening of uneconomic plant would cost one million dollars plus operating loss of several hundred thousand dollars a year

  5. J.C. Penney Co. v. N.L.R.B

    384 F.2d 479 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times

    No. 8874. August 29, 1967. William C. McClearn, Denver, Colo. (Robert L. Morris, Morris B. Hecox, Denver, Colo., Eugene F. Rowan and Martin Zeiger, New York City, with him on brief), for petitioner. Peter M. Giesey, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This matter arises from two separate unfair

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gruber's Super Market, Inc.

    501 F.2d 697 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v Gruber's Super Market (501 F.2d 697) the employer called a meeting of employees three days before election and (1) asked each why he wanted a union, and (2) told the employees that if the union did not win, the employees would get a raise.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Incorporated

    357 F.2d 138 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Inc., 357 F.2d 138 (5 Cir. 1966), both the attorney for the employer and the president of the Company were guilty of coercive measures in their attempts to obtain copies of statements made to Board investigators.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Arrow Elastic Corp.

    573 F.2d 702 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 8 times
    In Arrow, we found substantial evidence to uphold the finding of the Board that a speech by the employer promising that a fixed pension plan would be added to the existing profit sharing program was a promise of benefits resulting in an unfair labor practice.

  9. International Un. of E., R. v. N.L.R.B

    434 F.2d 473 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 22671, 22804. Argued September 23, 1969. Decided March 20, 1970. Mr. Herbert Fishgold, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 22,804 and respondent in No. 22,671. Mr. Russ R. Mueller