Simon v. Cmm'r

5 Cited authorities

  1. Furniss v. Cruikshank

    230 N.Y. 495 (N.Y. 1921)   Cited 50 times
    In Furniss v. Cruikshank (230 N.Y. 495) the court held that the beneficiary should be compensated for the income she would have received if the conversion had taken place within a reasonable time.
  2. Matter of Stevens

    187 N.Y. 471 (N.Y. 1907)   Cited 33 times
    In Matter of Stevens (187 N.Y. 471) the Court of Appeals, in considering all the prior cases, laid down the rule that, in the absence of a clear direction in the will to the contrary, where investments are made by the trustee, the principal must be maintained intact from loss by payment of premium on securities having only a definite time to run, while if the bonds are received from the estate of the testator, the whole interest should be treated as income.
  3. Furniss v. Cruikshank

    191 App. Div. 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)   Cited 3 times

    April 9, 1920. Brainard Tolles of counsel [ Davies, Auerbach Cornell, attorneys], for the plaintiffs. Franklin B. Lord, for the defendants, appellants and respondents. Julian C. Harrison of counsel [ William E. Reinhardt with him on the brief; Paine Harrison, attorneys], for the respondent Randolph Perkins, as substituted trustee, etc. MERRELL, J.: This action is brought to compel an accounting for the acts of a deceased testamentary trustee. A referee was appointed in the action to take and state

  4. N.Y. Life Ins. Trust Co. v. Baker

    59 N.E. 257 (N.Y. 1901)   Cited 19 times

    Argued December 14, 1900 Decided February 5, 1901 R.E. Robinson for appellant. Jesse Grant Roe for William J. Baker, respondent. Rastus S. Ransom and Porte V. Ransom, as guardian ad litem, for William Ver Planck Baker et al., respondents. PARKER, Ch. J. The only question arising on this appeal to which reference will be made in this opinion is whether this accounting trustee should have set apart out of the income a sufficient sum each year with which to form a sinking fund of such extent that the

  5. New York Life Ins. Trust Co. v. Kane

    17 App. Div. 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)   Cited 9 times

    May Term, 1897. Allison Butts, for the appellants, the executors of Walter Langdon. Wolcott G. Lane, for the appellants Kane and others. George G. De Witt, for the respondent Langdon. Egerton L. Winthrop, Jr., for the respondent Carroll. Tompkins McIvlaine, for the respondent Townsend. O'BRIEN, J.: The question to be determined on this appeal is that involved in the controversy between the defendants entitled by the terms of the trust deed to the principal of the trust estate, and the personal representatives