§

Simon Bros. Co., Inc.

173 N.L.R.B. 906 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Simon Bros. Co., Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  6. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. A.P.W. Products Co.

    316 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 40 times

    No. 258, Docket 27676. Argued March 11, 1963. Decided April 25, 1963. Melvin Pollack, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sidney A. Coven, Joseph Lepie, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Benjamin Wyle, New York City and Warren Woods, Washington, D.C., submitted brief as attorneys for amicus curiae, United Paper-makers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Rendering Company

    386 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 55, 56, Dockets 31183, 31184. Argued September 29, 1967. Decided December 11, 1967. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. William F. Joy, of Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges. J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Midwestern Manufacturing Company

    388 F.2d 251 (10th Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times

    No. 9405. January 15, 1968. Robert Hillman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for petitioner. William K. Powers, Tulsa, Okla. (Frank E. Turner, Tulsa, Okla., with him on brief), for respondents. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and DELEHANT, District Judge. Senior District Judge for the Eighth Circuit sitting by designation. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This matter arises from unfair labor practices complaints

  10. N.L.R.B. v. St. John's Associates, Inc.

    392 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 6 times

    No. 328, Docket 31753. Argued March 12, 1968. Decided March 25, 1968. Ian D. Lanoff, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Woodrow J. Sandler, New York City, for respondent. Before KAUFMAN, HAYS, Circuit Judges, and RYAN, District Judge. Of the District Court of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: Respondent