§
Silver Nugget

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.

    379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 77 times
    Hearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Newman-Green, Inc.

    401 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that no substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of anti-union animus where the employee, who had been repeatedly disciplined for coming to work under the influence of alcohol, was fired for drunkenness

  4. Crown Tar & Chemical Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    365 F.2d 588 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8372. August 26, 1966. John S. Pfeiffer, Denver, Colo. (Isaacson, Rosenbaum, Goldberg Miller, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin H. Reifin, Attorney, NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Solomon I. Hirsch, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and JONES and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. JONES, Circuit

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Peyton Fritton Stores, Inc.

    336 F.2d 769 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Peyton Fritton Stores, Inc., 336 F.2d 769, 770 (10th Cir. 1964), we held that while the statutory jurisdiction of the Board may be challenged at any time, "the facts upon which the Board determines it has jurisdiction may be challenged only upon timely exception, in the absence of which the Board's findings are not open to attack in the proceeding for enforcement."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Mark J. Gerry, Inc.

    355 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19561. January 5, 1966. Rehearings Denied March 14, 1966. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Soloman I. Hirsh, Marion Griffin, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bernard B. Laven, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for an order of this court enforcing an order of the

  7. Greene County Farm Bureau Coop. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.2d 335 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

    No. 16618. Argued March 13, 1962. Decided March 21, 1963. Mr. John O. Henry, Dayton, Ohio, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Ohio, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Preston B. Kavanagh and Edgar T. Bellinger, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. William J. Avrutis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L