Silver Bay Local Union No. 962

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
  2. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"
  3. NLRB v. SILVER BAY L. U. NO. 962, INT. BRO

    498 F.2d 26 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 14 times

    No. 73-1037. May 22, 1974. Stanley Zirkin (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, NLRB, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Lawrence Schwerin (argued), of Donaldson, Hafer, Cassidy Price, Seattle, Wash., for respondent. Before KOELSCH, CARTER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. OPINION EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions to enforce its order finding that the respondent union violated ยง 8(b)(1)(B) of

  4. United States v. Gulf Puerto Rico Lines, Inc.

    492 F.2d 1249 (1st Cir. 1974)   Cited 4 times

    No. 73-1368. Argued February 5, 1974. Decided March 19, 1974. Jose Antonio Fuste, San Juan, P.R., with whom Jimenez Fuste, San Juan, P.R., was on brief, for defendant, appellant. Morton Hollander, Atty. Dept. of Justice, with whom Irving Jaffe, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Julio Morales-Sanchez, U.S. Atty., and Robert S. Greenspan, Atty. Dept. of Justice, were on brief, for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE and

  5. Laborers' Int. U. of No. Amer. v. N.L.R.B

    503 F.2d 192 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 1 times

    No. 73-1819. Argued June 3, 1974. Decided July 10, 1974. Thomas J. Pilacek, North Miami Beach, Fla., for petitioner. Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The facts of the case are