§
Sigo Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  3. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  4. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company

    304 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19106. June 22, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to

  6. Wallace Corporation v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    141 F.2d 87 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 5135, 5163. February 3, 1944. On Petitions for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petitions of the Wallace Corporation opposed by Local No. 129, United Construction Workers' Organizing Committee and Richwood Clothespin Dishworkers Union, and of the Richwood Clothespin Dishworkers Union to review a cease and desist order of the National Labor Relations Board. Order enforced. R. Walston Chubb, of St. Louis, Mo. (Brooks B. Callaghan and Wolverton Callaghan, all of Richwood