§

Shrewsbury Motors, Inc.

281 N.L.R.B. 486 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Shrewsbury Motors, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. Arthur Young Co. v. U.S.

    466 U.S. 936 (1984)   Cited 133 times
    Remanding for determination of whether mother has cognizable claim under section 1983 "for the injury to her constitutionally protected liberty interest in parenthood"

  3. Spencer v. N.L.R.B

    712 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 194 times
    Recognizing that some determinations under EAJA are questions of fact

  4. Dougherty v. Lehman

    711 F.2d 555 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 101 times
    Finding agency position to be substantially justified where the issue raised a close question of law and at least one other court agreed with the government's position

  5. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"

  6. Dawson v. Pastrick

    600 F.2d 70 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 87 times
    Holding plaintiffs were prevailing parties because litigation "operated as a catalyst prompting the defendants to institute fair employment practices"

  7. Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    695 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 78 times
    Blocking recovery of attorneys fees in agency actions which were resolved prior to Act's effective date, although relying on a different interpretation of the Act

  8. United States for Heydt v. Citizens State Bank

    668 F.2d 444 (8th Cir. 1982)   Cited 48 times
    Implying that EAJA is retroactive, but government's position was substantially justified

  9. Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times

    No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:

  10. Gibson v. Zahradnick

    581 F.2d 75 (4th Cir. 1978)   Cited 32 times

    No. 77-1415. Argued October 6, 1977. Decided July 19, 1978. Stephen W. Bricker, Richmond, Va., for appellant. Jerry P. Slonaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va. (Anthony F. Troy, Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. HAYNSWORTH, Chief

  11. Section 2412 - Costs and fees

    28 U.S.C. § 2412   Cited 30,157 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Limiting the eligibility of individuals and entities to claim attorney's fees under EAJA to those who "net worth" is under specified amounts

  12. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 657 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication