§

Shopping Kart Food Market, Inc.

228 N.L.R.B. 1311 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Shopping Kart Food Market, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  4. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 259 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  5. Home Town Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    416 F.2d 392 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Denying enforcement

  6. Henderson Trumbull Supply Corp v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 1224 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 23 times
    Stating an identical proposition for an election decided by one vote

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Modine Manufacturing Co.

    500 F.2d 914 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 14 times

    No. 73-1664. Submitted April 15, 1974. Decided August 5, 1974. Jonathan Axelrod, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John D. O'Brien, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from the NLRB. Before MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge, and ROSS and WEBSTER, Circuit Judges. WEBSTER, Circuit Judge. The single issue on this application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board is whether respondent Modine Manufacturing Company was entitled to a hearing to determine whether

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Cactus Drilling Corporation

    455 F.2d 871 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 13 times
    Distinguishing rebuttal from opportunity to rebut

  9. LaCrescent Constant Care Center, v. N.L.R.B

    510 F.2d 1319 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 10 times

    No. 74-1468. Submitted December 12, 1974, Decided February 19, 1975. R. Walter Bachman, Jr., Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner. Stephen Quinn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LAY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge. TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge. This case is before us on the petition

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Carlton McLendon Furniture Co. Inc.

    488 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times

    No. 73-1598. January 9, 1974. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, Region 15, N.L.R.B., New Orleans, La., Allen H. Feldman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C. Lash Harrison, John Bacheller, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before THORNBERRY, SIMPSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: This application for enforcement of a National Labor Relations Board order comes to us after the usual procedural