§

Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative

360 N.L.R.B. 349 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Bakery Workers

    430 U.S. 243 (1977)   Cited 532 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause survived the expiration of the CBA, even though the agreement was silent as to survival

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  6. Sara Lee Bak. Gro. v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.

    514 F.3d 422 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that a "`bare assertion' of relevancy falls short" of satisfying the union's burden

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Whitesell Corp.

    638 F.3d 883 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 12 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of enforcement on the basis that the Board lacked a proper quorum did not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to consider the case anew

  8. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  9. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  10. N.L.R.B. v. New York Telephone Co.

    930 F.2d 1009 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 23 times

    No. 1010, Docket 90-4136. Argued January 31, 1991. Decided April 16, 1991. Paul Hitterman, Washington, D.C. (Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.), for petitioner. Michael Hertzberg, New York City, for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before KEARSE, PRATT and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges. McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: This is a petition by the National Labor Relations