Shelby Memorial Home

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Tama Meat Packing Corp v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    575 F.2d 661 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 3 times

    No. 77-1573. Submitted February 15, 1978. Decided May 12, 1978. Fred W. Elarbee, Atlanta, Ga., argued, for petitioner; Elarbee, Clark Paul, Atlanta, Ga., on brief. Lynne Deitch, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations

  4. Falcon Lock Co. v. Best Universal Lock Co.

    362 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 19880. May 24, 1966. V.D. Beehler, Beehler Arant, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Falcon Lock. Dean C. Dunlavey, Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Best Universal and others. Before JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and TAVARES, District Judge. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: The parties are competitors in the manufacture of door locks. Falcon brought this suit to secure a declaratory judgment to the effect that neither it (through the sale of its locks and lock parts) nor its