§
Shelby Liquors

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Miller Redwood Company

    407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 42 times

    No. 22573. February 25, 1969. Herbert Fishgold, Washington, D.C. (argued), Janet Kohn, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Carrell F. Bradley (argued), of Schwenn, Bradley Batchelor, Hillsboro, Or., for respondent. Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges. J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge, United

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Long Island Airport Limousine Serv

    468 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    Affirming NLRB finding of Section 8 violation where discharged employee, who was “union ‘spearhead’ for organizing the [c]ompany's drivers,” had been soliciting union support on day before abrupt discharge, and employer's asserted reasons that employee had poor employment record, had received traffic tickets, and submitted incomplete paperwork—including “a particularly serious incident ... that involved missing cash collections” for which he was warned—were contradictory and pretextual, and where treatment of other employees for similar misconduct was disparate

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. West Coast Casket Company, Inc.

    469 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 19 times

    No. 72-1026. November 17, 1972. Michael Winer, Atty. (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, NLRB, Los Angles, Cal., for petitioner. Carl Minton (argued), of Minton Minton, Michael Posner, of Geffner Satzman, Los Angeles, Cal. (for charging party) for the respondent. Before: HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge. The Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District

  8. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    354 F.2d 707 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    No. 22180. January 10, 1966. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul M. Thompson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge. HUNTER, District Judge. The Great Atlantic and Pacific

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Bolt Company

    313 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19652. February 13, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. W.D. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex. (Vinson, Elkins, Weems Searls, Houston, Tex., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Jr., Circuit Judge. The case