§

Sheet Metal Workers, Local 38

231 N.L.R.B. 699 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Sheet Metal Workers, Local 38

12 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

  4. Natonal Labor Relations Board v. Columbus Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union No. 252

    543 F.2d 1161 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that interest arbitration clauses "are not enforceable to perpetuate inclusion of [interest] arbitration clauses continuously in contract after contract"

  5. Chattanooga v. Chattanooga News-Free Press

    524 F.2d 1305 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 45 times
    Requiring arbitration consistent with parties' intent although arbitration procedure they selected was unworkable

  6. Winston-Salem Printing Press v. Piedmont Pub

    393 F.2d 221 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 27 times
    In Winston-Salem Printing Pressmen Union v. Piedmont Publishing Co., 393 F.2d 221 (4th Cir. 1968), the collective bargaining agreement contained a contract duration clause which provided in pertinent part: "this agreement shall continue from November 1 through October 31 from year to year and can be changed only by mutual consent or through negotiations started by written notice....

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Massachusetts Nurses Ass'n

    557 F.2d 894 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 12 times

    No. 76-1451. June 24, 1977. Alan Banov, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. James T. Grady, Boston, Mass., with whom Grady McDonald, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge, and MARKEY, Chief Judge. Of the Court

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Printing Pressmen

    549 F.2d 308 (4th Cir. 1977)   Cited 10 times

    No. 76-1414. Argued November 8, 1976. Decided February 10, 1977. Alan Banov, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl. L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. John S. McLellan, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, RUSSELL

  9. Aikens v. Abel

    373 F. Supp. 425 (W.D. Pa. 1974)   Cited 12 times
    In Aikens v. Abel, 373 F. Supp. 425 (W.D.Pa. 1974), a federal district court rejected the notion that a union had breached its duty of fair representation by giving up the right to strike in return for an interest arbitration clause.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Detroit Resilient Floor Decorators

    317 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times

    No. 15082. May 22, 1963. Ira Lechner, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Joseph C. Thackery, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Sander M. Levin, Detroit, Mich. (Schwartz, O'Hare Levin, Detroit, Mich., Boaz Siegel, Detroit, Mich., of counsel, on the brief), for respondent. Before CECIL, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and TAYLOR, District

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"