§

Sheet Metal Workers, Local 71

193 N.L.R.B. 23 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Sheet Metal Workers, Local 71

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  2. Local 542, Int'l Un. of Oper. E. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times

    No. 14286. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided March 13, 1964. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Martin J. Vigderman, Wilfred F. Lorry, Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Leo Maguire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Earle K. Shawe, Baltimore, Md. (Sidney J. Barban, Baltimore,

  3. General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee

  4. Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  5. N.L.R.B. v. William J. Burns Internat'l

    346 F.2d 897 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 23 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. William J. Burns Int'l Detective Agency, Inc., 346 F.2d 897 (8th Cir. 1965), this court held that where Burns could not continue business in a particular area without incurring substantial financial loss and there was a lack of antiunion motivation, the division was closed for economic reasons and precluded a finding of unfair labor practice.

  6. Carpenters District Council, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    274 F.2d 564 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14727. Argued April 30, 1959. Decided July 9, 1959. Messrs. David Leo Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., and Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Mr. Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, at the time the brief was filed, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Allison