§

Sheet Metal Workers Local 15 (Brandon Regional Medical Center)

346 N.L.R.B. 199 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Sheet Metal Workers Local 15 (Brandon Regional Medical Center)

11 Cited authorities

  1. Babbitt v. Farm Workers

    442 U.S. 289 (1979)   Cited 1,933 times
    Holding a case justiciable even though the plaintiffs disavowed any intent to "propagate untruths"

  2. DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council

    485 U.S. 568 (1988)   Cited 729 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"

  3. Larez v. City of Los Angeles

    946 F.2d 630 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,230 times
    Holding that defendants' challenge to a punitive damages jury instruction was foreclosed because the issue was not raised at trial but noting that the instruction given, which included "maliciously, wantonly, or oppressively," was within the standard set by Supreme Court in Smith v. Wade

  4. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001

    447 U.S. 607 (1980)   Cited 82 times
    Finding Congress struck a “delicate balance between union freedom of expression and the ability of neutral employers, employees, and consumers to remain free from coerced participation in industrial strife”

  6. Longshoremen v. Allied International, Inc.

    456 U.S. 212 (1982)   Cited 74 times
    Finding foreseeability relevant in determining damages, and rejecting argument that union did not foresee that refusing to handle a shipper's cargo would result in disruption of the shipper's business as facially implausible

  7. Tucker v. City of Fairfield, Ohio

    398 F.3d 457 (6th Cir. 2005)   Cited 58 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that protestors' use of temporary 12 x 8 foot rat balloon was constitutionally protected expression within parameters of the First Amendment

  8. Overstreet v. United Broth. of Carpenters

    409 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that "interpreting the [NLRA] to prohibit" peaceful "bannering activity would pose a ‘significant risk’ of sanctioning a violation of the First Amendment"

  9. United Ass'n of Journeymen v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 1108 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 89-70289, 89-70336. Argued and Submitted July 13, 1990. Decided August 30, 1990. Hugh Hafer, Hafer, Price, Rinehart Schwerin, Seattle, Washington, for petitioner/respondent. Judith A. Dowd, Supervisory Atty., Joseph J. Jablonski, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent/petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUG, NELSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. HUG, Circuit Judge: I. The United States Association of Journeymen and

  10. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,589 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  11. Rule 902 - Evidence That Is Self-Authenticating

    Fed. R. Evid. 902   Cited 2,208 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Allowing authentication of domestic records of regularly conducted activity "by a certification of the custodian or another qualified person"