§

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 27, AFL-CIO (E.P. Donnelly, Inc.)

357 N.L.R.B. 1577 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 27, AFL-CIO (E.P. Donnelly, Inc.)

11 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 310 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  3. Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.

    507 U.S. 218 (1993)   Cited 343 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Boston's requiring a no-strike provision in subcontractor agreements was permissible market participation because the city was "attempting to ensure an efficient project that would be completed as quickly and effectively as possible" and because "analogous private conduct would be permitted"

  4. Small v. Oper. Plasterers'

    611 F.3d 483 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to delete a paragraph of the preliminary injunction order that imposed restrictions on the party appealing the preliminary injunction

  5. Sheet Metal Workers Intern. Ass'n v. E.P. Donnelly

    673 F. Supp. 2d 313 (D.N.J. 2009)   Cited 19 times
    Finding an arbitration award preclusive where "there [was] no genuine dispute that the procedures governing the arbitration were fair and that the arbitration produced a final award."

  6. Local 30, United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    1 F.3d 1419 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that maintenance of a suit by the losing union in an NLRB jurisdictional dispute to confirm a corresponding favorable arbitration award amounts to an unfair labor practice

  7. Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    285 F.3d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 00-1443. Argued November 1, 2001. Decided April 12, 2002. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Donald H. Scharg argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Steven J. Fishman and Thomas A. Pinch. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  8. Moore-Duncan v. Sheet Metal Workers' Intern. Ass'n

    624 F. Supp. 2d 367 (D.N.J. 2008)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 08-1896 (RMB). September 2, 2008. Henry R. Protas, Esquire, Carmen P. Cialino, Jr., Esquire, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Brett I. Last, Esquire, O'Brien, Belland Bushinsky, LLC, Northfield, NJ, for Defendant. OPINION BUMB, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff's, Dorothy L. Moore-Duncan, Regional Director of the Fourth Region of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB," "the Board," or "Petitioner"), petition for relief under Section 10( l)

  9. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 776 Affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    973 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Affirming the Board's imposition of attorney's fees from the time at which the arbitration became unlawful

  10. Bro-Tech Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    105 F.3d 890 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 95-3343 and 95-3399. Argued June 27, 1996. Filed January 31, 1997. Stephen J. Cabot (argued), Harvey, Pennington, Herting Renneisen, Philadelphia, PA, for Bro-Tech Corp. t/a Purolite. Aileen A. Armstrong, Richard A. Cohen (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for National Labor Relations Board. On Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement (Nos. 4-RC-17846 and 4-CA-234586) BEFORE: BECKER, NYGAARD and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit