§

Sheehy Enterprizes, Inc.

353 N.L.R.B. 803 (N.L.R.B. 2009)
Sheehy Enterprizes, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Transfer v. Southwest Admin

    479 U.S. 1065 (1987)   Cited 225 times
    Holding that the only information that must be disclosed is information necessary to make disclosed information not misleading.

  2. Sw. Adm'rs, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer

    791 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 322 times
    Holding that fraud in the execution is a valid defense, but that fraud in the inducement is not

  3. Commonwealth Communications, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.3d 465 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that "[i]n the absence of ambiguity in collective bargaining agreement ... [courts] have no cause to examine extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second