Shaw��s Supermarkets

12 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.
343 U.S. 395 (1952) Cited 269 times
Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
Hotel Employees, Local 2 v. Marriott Corp.
961 F.2d 1464 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 30 times
Holding that an employer could waive its right to demand a National Labor Relations Board election
Hotel Rest. Emp. Union v. J.P. Morgan Hotel
996 F.2d 561 (2d Cir. 1993) Cited 26 times
Holding that section 301 “grants courts concurrent jurisdiction [with the NLRB] over representation issues arising under a contract”
N.L.R.B. v. Lyon Ryan Ford, Inc.
647 F.2d 745 (7th Cir. 1981) Cited 38 times
In Lyon Ryan Ford, after looking through the union authorization cards, the employer and Union discussed details in the Union's proposed contract and the employer added up figures on his adding machine to determine how far apart the parties were on expected wages and benefits.
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local U., v. N.L.R.B
676 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1982) Cited 28 times
Holding that waiver of statutory rights must be "clear and unmistakable"
Retail Clerks International Ass'n Local No. 455 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
510 F.2d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1975) Cited 31 times
Reversing NLRB and upholding an "additional stores" clause, despite the fact that it had not been changed or negotiated for ten years
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
361 F.3d 395 (7th Cir. 2004)
No. 03-3054. Argued February 13, 2004. Decided March 16, 2004. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Nos. 13-CA-39279, 13-CA-39271, 13-CA-39181. Charles R. Kiser (argued), IUOE Local 150 Legal Dept., Countryside, IL, for Petitioner. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, IL, Julie F. Marcus (argued), National Labor Relations Board Appellate Court, Enforcement, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Douglas A. Darch (argued), Seyfarth Shaw, Chicago, IL
Snow v. N.L.R.B
308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 30 times
In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

Shaw���s Supermarkets

12 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

Holding that an employer could waive its right to demand a National Labor Relations Board election

Holding that section 301 “grants courts concurrent jurisdiction [with the NLRB] over representation issues arising under a contract”

In Lyon Ryan Ford, after looking through the union authorization cards, the employer and Union discussed details in the Union's proposed contract and the employer added up figures on his adding machine to determine how far apart the parties were on expected wages and benefits.

Holding that waiver of statutory rights must be "clear and unmistakable"

Reversing NLRB and upholding an "additional stores" clause, despite the fact that it had not been changed or negotiated for ten years

In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

Shaw��s Supermarkets