§

Shawn's Launch Service, Inc.

261 N.L.R.B. 836 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Shawn's Launch Service, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Transportation Union v. U. P. R. Co.

    385 U.S. 157 (1966)   Cited 223 times
    Holding that "[i]n order to interpret . . . [a collective bargaining] agreement it is necessary to consider the scope of other related collective bargaining agreements, as well as the practice, usage and custom pertaining to all such agreements."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Donkin's Inn, Inc.

    532 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 42 times

    No. 74-3252. March 4, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1976. Edmund Cooke, Atty. (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert S. Rose (argued), of Harris Aranda, Marina Del Rey, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION TRASK, Circuit Judge: This is an application for Enforcement of an Order of the NLRB, issued on October 9, 1974, against Donkin's Inn, Inc. (hereafter, "the Company") for certain violations of sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the

  3. Houchens Market of Elizabethtown v. N.L.R.B

    375 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times
    In Houchens, for example, the union initially told the employer that "any contract proposal or recommendation would be subject to approval by the employees."

  4. Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Lozano Enterprises v. NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 814, a complete tentative agreement was reached; this was revised and then signed by the company's president but retained, until after the certification year expired, by its labor consultant, with a misrepresentation on his part to the union that the agreement had not been signed.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & W Lektra Bat Co.

    513 F.2d 200 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 3 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. C W Lektra Bat Co., 513 F.2d 200 (6th Cir. 1975), the union conceded that it had told the company during negotiations that the contract would be submitted to employees for ratification. Still, the Court granted enforcement of the order by the Board, which had demanded "specific proof" of "an agreement to make ratification a condition precedent to a collective-bargaining agreement."