§

Sharon Hats, Inc.

127 N.L.R.B. 947 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Sharon Hats, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. Feldmann v. Perlman

    349 U.S. 952 (1955)   Cited 89 times

    C.A.2d Circuit. No. 743. June 6, 1955. Arthur H. Dean and Howard T. Milman for petitioners. Eugene Eisenmann and William E. Haudek for respondents. Reported below: 219 F.2d 173. Certiorari denied.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United States Cold Storage Corp.

    203 F.2d 924 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that an employer who insists on negotiating by mail or that a union submit its proposals in writing has unlawfully refused to bargain

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Henry Heide, Inc.

    219 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 14 times

    No. 66, Docket 23078. Argued October 5, 1954. Decided January 19, 1955. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Schmidt, Egan, Kenny, Smith Murray, New York City (Godfrey P. Schmidt, of counsel), for respondent Henry Heide, Inc. Arnold Cohen, New York City (Herbert A. Simon, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent Local 452. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Clark Lewis Co.

    274 F.2d 817 (5th Cir. 1960)

    No. 17963. February 17, 1960. Richard J. Scupi, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert C. Lane, Miami, Fla., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that respondent interfered with, restrained, and coerced