§

SHAMROCK CARTAGE, INC.

09-CA-219396 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 6, 2018)
SHAMROCK CARTAGE, INC.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 513 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  4. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally

  5. Autonation, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 7 times
    Finding employer's claim that it fired employee due to job abandonment to be a pretext because employer knew that employee had filed for unemployment benefits and was under the impression that he had already been terminated and yet the company did nothing to correct the employee's alleged misimpression

  6. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience

  7. Bruce Packing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.3d 18 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 12–1054 12–1137. 07-24-2015 BRUCE PACKING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Laborers' International Union of North America, Local No. 296, AFL–CIO, Intervenor. Bryan P. O'Connor argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Joseph E. Schuler and Joel J. Borovsky. Nicole Lancia, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company

    405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 40 times
    Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

  9. Wyman-Gordon Co. v. N.L.R.B

    654 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 20 times
    Finding statement that "bargaining would 'begin at zero' and work up" constituted a violation of § 8

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Lipman Brothers, Inc.

    355 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 6526. Heard December 6, 1965. Decided January 21, 1966. Anthony J. Obadal, Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Murray Brown, Boston, Mass., with whom William F. Joy and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondents. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.