§

SHAMBAUGH & SON, L.P.

25-CA-141001 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 17, 2015)
SHAMBAUGH & SON, L.P.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 50 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  3. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  4. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  5. Sheet Metal Workers, v. N.L.R.B

    561 F.3d 497 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 07-1479, 08-1009, 08-1039, 08-1081. Argued February 17, 2009. Decided April 3, 2009. On Petitions for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of Orders of the National Labor Relations Board. Michael T. Anderson argued the Standing and the Merits of the Board's Oil Capitol Rule for petitioner Sheet Metal Workers International Association. With him on the briefs were Arlus J. Stephens and Loren Gibson. Michael J. Stapp argued the Standing and the Merits of the Board's Oil Capitol Rule for