§

Sewell-Allen Big Star, Inc.

294 N.L.R.B. 312 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Sewell-Allen Big Star, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182

    475 U.S. 192 (1986)   Cited 76 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc.

    584 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 58 times
    In Tahoe Nugget and Sahara-Tahoe we stressed that the evidence presented to establish reasonable good faith doubt, individually or cumulatively, must unequivocally indicate that union support had declined to a minority.

  4. Weather Tamer, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    676 F.2d 483 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 17 times
    In Weather Tamer there was no daily contact between the employees being terminated and those remaining, rather there was only a single conversation between management and a non-terminated employee in which the closing was linked with anti-union animus.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edjo, Inc.

    631 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times

    No. 79-7002. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1980. Decided October 28, 1980. Kenneth B. Hipp, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Mark D. Jordan, Santa Rosa, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of Order. Before SNEED and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD, District Judge. Honorable M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation. POOLE, Circuit Judge: The

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pace Oldsmobile, Inc.

    681 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times

    No. 760, Docket 81-4207. Argued April 5, 1982. Decided May 28, 1982. Linda Dreeben, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Stuart M. Kirshenbaum, New York City (Lawrence I. Milman, Milman, Naness Pollack, New York City, on brief), for respondent. Before KEARSE and PIERCE, Circuit Judges, and LEVAL,

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Process Pollution Control Co.

    588 F.2d 786 (10th Cir. 1978)   Cited 14 times
    In Process Pollution Control and Scenic Hudson, detailed and specific evidence was tendered, but was rejected by the agencies.

  8. Kendall College v. N.L.R.B

    570 F.2d 216 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times

    No. 77-1418. Argued October 26, 1977. Decided February 17, 1978. James S. Whitehead, Lawrence I. Kipperman, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Marjorie Gofreed, William F. Wachter, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SWYGERT and BAUER, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge William J. Campbell of the Northern District

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Des Moines Foods, Inc.

    296 F.2d 285 (8th Cir. 1961)   Cited 20 times

    No. 16694. November 29, 1961. Leo N. McGuire, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. made argument for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., and Leo N. McGuire, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. were on the brief. Hobart E. Newton, Stuart, Iowa, made argument for respondent, and was on the brief. Before SANBORN, MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges. SANBORN

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions