§

Service Employees Local 32B-32J (Pratt Towers)

337 N.L.R.B. 317 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Service Employees Local 32B-32J (Pratt Towers)

7 Cited authorities

  1. Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    Nos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty

  2. Iron Workers Dist. Council v. N.L.R.B

    913 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Applying Moore Dry Dock criteria to determine whether picketing on secondary employer's premises is primary or secondary

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    405 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.

  4. Bricklayers Stone Masons Union v. N.L.R.B

    562 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 8 times
    In Bricklayers, the Board found that the picket line clauses of the bricklayers', laborers', engineers', and plumbers' unions were in violation of section 8(e) of the Act because the clauses were broad enough as written or applied to sanction refusals to cross secondary picket lines, and the clauses were not saved by virtue of the construction industry proviso to section 8(e).

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Local 445

    473 F.2d 249 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a finding that union's threat to picket coupled with a statements that "not a wheel will turn" and "[n]othing will move" were unlawful threats under Section 8(b)(B)

  6. International B. of Elec. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 1085 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 9 times

    No. 22146. Argued February 26, 1969. Decided April 16, 1969. Mr. Dixon L. Pyles, Jackson, Miss., with whom Mr. Laurence J. Cohen, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. David C. Nevins, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., National

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease