§

Service Employees Local 1119 (Staten Island University Hospital)

339 N.L.R.B. 1059 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Service Employees Local 1119 (Staten Island University Hospital)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 732 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

  2. Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc.

    355 U.S. 131 (1957)   Cited 180 times
    Upholding state court injunction against violent picketing

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms

  4. Communications Workers v. N.L.R.B

    362 U.S. 479 (1960)   Cited 70 times
    Striking part of an NLRB order requiring a union to refrain from coercing employees of "any other employer" where the NLRB had found that the union had coerced only the employees of the named employer

  5. Brockton Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.3d 100 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 17 times
    In Brockton Hospital, the hospital employer maintained a confidentiality policy providing that "[i]nformation concerning patients, [nurses], or hospital operations should not be discussed..., except strictly in connection with hospital business."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  7. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores

    540 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 27 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 75-1372, 75-1374 to 75-1376. Argued February 10, 1976. Decided June 21, 1976. Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel and Andrew F. Tranovich, Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. Paul Schachter, Hato Rey, P.R., with whom David Scribner, Elizabeth Schneider, New York City, Luis M. Escribano, Hato Rey, P.R., Ralph Shapiro, New York City, and Ismael Delgado Gonzalez, San Juan

  9. Domsey Trading Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    16 F.3d 517 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 904, 905, Docket 93-4089L, 93-4179XAP. Argued December 15, 1993. Decided February 18, 1994. H. Reed Ellis, Newark, New Jersey (Robert T. McGovern, DeMaria, Ellis, Hunt, Salsberg Friedman, Newark, New Jersey, of counsel), for Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. David Habenstreit, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Jerry M. Hunter, General Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy General Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Supervisory

  10. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    955 F.2d 212 (4th Cir. 1992)   Cited 3 times
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b)(B) violation where "exhaustive documentation" supported "finding that the picketing had a replacement objective," including announcements by union president that union "will succeed in restoring its membership to their rightful jobs and conditions" and members should do their "utmost to stop the flow of replacements"