§

Sensormatic Electronics, LLC

IPR2020-01487 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 16, 2021)
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Sensormatic Elecs., LLC v. Wyze Labs, Inc.

    No. 2020-2320 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 14, 2021)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim was representative because the plaintiff "fails to identify any relevant claim limitations, alone or in combination, that the [district] court failed to consider."

  2. Sensormatic Elecs., LLC v. Wyze Labs, Inc.

    484 F. Supp. 3d 161 (D. Del. 2020)   Cited 3 times

    Civil Action No. 19-1543-CFC 09-03-2020 SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WYZE LABS, INC., Defendant. Steven Balick, Andrew Mayo, ASHBY & GEDDES, Wilmington, Delaware; Jeffrey Costakos, Kadi Jelechick, Kevin Malaney, Sarah Rieger, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Counsel for Plaintiff. Karen Jacobs, Cameron Clark, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Patricia Rogowski, ROGOWSKI LAW LLC, Wilmington, Delaware; Reuben Chen, COOLEY LLP, Palo Alto, California

  3. Section 101 - Inventions patentable

    35 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 3,531 times   2295 Legal Analyses
    Defining patentable subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof."

  4. Section 318 - Decision of the Board

    35 U.S.C. § 318   Cited 162 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Governing the incorporation of claims added via the operation of § 316(d)

  5. Section 317 - Settlement

    35 U.S.C. § 317   Cited 37 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Addressing continuation of IPR as to some petitioners after dismissal of others

  6. Section 42.72 - Termination of trial

    37 C.F.R. § 42.72   Cited 2 times   16 Legal Analyses

    The Board may terminate a trial without rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including where the trial is consolidated with another proceeding or pursuant to a joint request under 35 U.S.C. 317(a) or 327(a) . 37 C.F.R. §42.72