3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 timesExplaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Minnesota Licensed Practical Nurses Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
406 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir. 2005) Cited 2 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 03-3306. Submitted: October 21, 2004. Filed: May 11, 2005. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Harold Craig Becker, argued, Chicago, IL (Gregg M. Corwin, on the brief), for petitioner Jill A. Griffin, argued, NLRB, for Respondent. James M. Dawson, argued, Minneapolis, MN, argued on behalf of the intervenor, Alexandria Clinic, P.A., in opposition to the petitioner's petition for review. Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, MAGILL and BENTON, Circuit Judges. LOKEN, Chief Judge. The
Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004) Cited 2 timesNo. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)