Seine and Line Fishermen's Union of San Pedro

4 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
  2. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Townsend

    185 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1950)   Cited 30 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Townsend, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 378, this court found jurisdiction in respect to the activities of a local Hudson automobile dealer where it appeared that while the respondent, operating at Santa Maria, California, purchased all of his new automobiles from the Hudson Sales Corporation at Los Angeles, yet the latter organization shipped all of such automobiles into the State from outside points.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Moss Amber Mfg. Co.

    264 F.2d 107 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 9 times

    No. 15952. February 27, 1959. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C., George A. O'Brien, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Frank A. Mouritsen, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before FEE, CHAMBERS and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before this Court upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the