§

Security Walls, LLC

28-CA-022701 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 21, 2010)
Security Walls, LLC

11 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Janis

    428 U.S. 433 (1976)   Cited 1,138 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding the exclusionary rule inapplicable to civil tax proceedings

  2. Elliott v. U.S.

    596 F.3d 842 (D.C. Cir. 2010)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that a blueprint is properly withheld under exemption 2-high

  3. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  4. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  5. Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

  6. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  7. Texas Instruments, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    637 F.2d 822 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that violation of a company rule that “prohibited disclosure of classified material” was a “good” reason for discharging the employees

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bay Daily Breeze

    415 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 19 times
    In NLRB v. South Bay Daily Breeze, 415 F.2d 360 (9 Cir. 1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 915, 90 S.Ct. 919, 25 L.Ed.2d 96 (1970), the exclusionary rule was held inappropriate to a labor relations matter.

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 99,834 times   680 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  10. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,633 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  11. Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 901   Cited 5,325 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication